Subcutaneous Rituximab May Be Equivalent to Intravenous Formulation

Share this content:
Subcutaneous rituximab achieved trough serum concentrations that were pharmacokinetically equivalent to those achieved with intravenous rituximab.
Subcutaneous rituximab achieved trough serum concentrations that were pharmacokinetically equivalent to those achieved with intravenous rituximab.

Subcutaneous rituximab 1600 mg, in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, achieved trough serum concentrations that were pharmacokinetically equivalent to those achieved with intravenous rituximab 500 mg/m2, a study published in the journal The Lancet Haematology has shown.1

The safety and efficacy profiles were also similar between the 2 regimens.

For the phase 1b trial, researchers sought to confirm the pharmacokinetic non-inferiority of subcutaneous rituximab as compared with intravenous rituximab, and evaluate its safety and efficacy.

Researchers enrolled 176 adult patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive rituximab 1600 mg subcutaneously or rituximab 500 mg/m2 intravenously, plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, every 4 weeks for up to 6 cycles. All patients received rituximab 375 mg/m2 intravenously in cycle 1.

Results showed that the geometric mean trough serum concentration at cycle 5 in patients who received subcutaneous rituximab was non-inferior to that in patients given intravenous rituximab (97.5 μg/mL vs 61.5 μg/mL).

In terms of safety, a similar proportion of patients between the 2 treatment arms reported experiencing treatment-related adverse events. Grade 3 or higher neutropenia occurred in 56% of patients in the subcutaneous group and 52% of those in the intravenous group. Serious febrile neutropenia was reported in 11% and 4%, respectively.

Researchers also found that a comparable proportion of patients experienced infusion-related reactions; however, there were differences in the rate of injection-site erythema and nausea. Injection site erythema was more common in the subcutaneous group, whereas nausea was more common in the intravenous arm.

RELATED: Hair, Nail Abnormalities May be Common in Patients With CLL Treated With Ibrutinib

“Treatment with subcutaneous rituximab should allow patients with CLL to receive clinical benefit from the drug via a more convenient delivery method than the intravenous route, and might also be used in combination regimens with approved and emerging oral regimens,” the authors concluded.

Reference

  1. Assouline S, Buccheri V, Delmer A, et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of subcutaneous versus intravenous rituximab plus chemotherapy as treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (SAWYER): a phase 1b, open-label, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Lancet Haematol. 2016;3(3):e128-e138.

Related Resources

You must be a registered member of Cancer Therapy Advisor to post a comment.

Regimen and Drug Listings

GET FULL LISTINGS OF TREATMENT Regimens and Drug INFORMATION

Bone Cancer Regimens Drugs
Brain Cancer Regimens Drugs
Breast Cancer Regimens Drugs
Endocrine Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gastrointestinal Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gynecologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Head and Neck Cancer Regimens Drugs
Hematologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Lung Cancer Regimens Drugs
Other Cancers Regimens
Prostate Cancer Regimens Drugs
Rare Cancers Regimens
Renal Cell Carcinoma Regimens Drugs
Skin Cancer Regimens Drugs
Urologic Cancers Regimens Drugs

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters