Trabectedin Improves PFS vs Best Supportive Care in Sarcoma

Compared with best supportive care, trabectedin significantly improves progression-free survival among patients with pretreated advanced soft tissue sarcoma.
Compared with best supportive care, trabectedin significantly improves progression-free survival among patients with pretreated advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

Compared with best supportive care, trabectedin significantly improves progression-free survival among patients with pretreated advanced soft tissue sarcoma, according to a study presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2016 Congress.1

Although trabectedin has demonstrated single-agent activity among patients with pretreated advanced soft tissue sarcoma, it has never been compared with best supportive care in a randomized trial of patients with soft tissue sarcoma of multiple histologies, with the exception of translocation-related sarcomas. For the present study researchers assessed the efficacy, safety, and quality of life of trabectedin versus best supportive care as second- or later-line therapy in this patient population.

For the phase 3 study, investigators enrolled 103 French patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma who progressed after at least 1 anthracycline-containing regimen and had received fewer than 3 previous lines of chemotherapy. Of those, 58.3% had liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma.

Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive trabectedin via 24-hour continuous intravenous infusion every 3 weeks or best supportive care until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

After 88 progression events, results showed that median progression-free survival was 1.4 months with best supportive care compared with 3.0 months with trabectedin, corresponding to a 60% reduction in the risk of progression for trabectedin (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; 95% CI, 0.26-0.63; P < .0001).

RELATED: Adding Evofosfamide to Doxorubicin Fails to Improve OS in Sarcoma

Among those with liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma, median progression-free survival was 5.8 months and 1.4 months in the trabectedin and best supportive care arms, respectively (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.62; P = .0003).

Among patients without those histologies, median progression-free survival was 2.6 months in the trabectedin group and 1.3 months in the best supportive care arm (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.26-0.94; P = .03).                    

Reference

  1. Le Cesne A, Blay J, Cupissol D, et al. Results of a prospective randomized phase III T-SAR trial comparing trabectedin vs best supportive care (BSC) in patients with pretreated advanced soft tissue sarcoma (ASTS). Paper presented at: European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2016 Congress; October 7-11, 2016; Copenhagen, Denmark.

Related Resources

You must be a registered member of Cancer Therapy Advisor to post a comment.

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters

Regimen and Drug Listings

GET FULL LISTINGS OF TREATMENT Regimens and Drug INFORMATION

Bone Cancer Regimens Drugs
Brain Cancer Regimens Drugs
Breast Cancer Regimens Drugs
Endocrine Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gastrointestinal Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gynecologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Head and Neck Cancer Regimens Drugs
Hematologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Lung Cancer Regimens Drugs
Other Cancers Regimens
Prostate Cancer Regimens Drugs
Rare Cancers Regimens
Renal Cell Carcinoma Regimens Drugs
Skin Cancer Regimens Drugs
Urologic Cancers Regimens Drugs