FOLFIRI and XELIRI Are Safe, Well-tolerated in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Share this content:
Despite differences in the safety profiles and rates of adverse events, both FOLFIRI and XELIRI were safe and well-tolerated as second-line therapy.
Despite differences in the safety profiles and rates of adverse events, both FOLFIRI and XELIRI were safe and well-tolerated as second-line therapy.

Despite differences in the safety profiles and rates of adverse events, both FOLFIRI [fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan] and XELIRI [capecitabine plus irinotecan] with or without bevacizumab were safe and well-tolerated as second-line therapy among Asian patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), according to a study being presented at the 2017 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.1

For the international, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 AXEPT trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01996306), investigators compared the efficacy and safety of XELIRI with that of FOLFIRI with or without bevacizumab among patients with mCRC requiring second-line treatment.

The researchers enrolled 1275 patients from South Korea, China, and Japan with histologically-confirmed inoperable colorectal adenocarcinoma who withdrew from first-line chemotherapy due to intolerable toxicity or disease progression, or who had relapsed within 180 days after the last dose of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive irinotecan on day 1 plus capecitabine twice daily for 2 weeks of each 3-week cycle (XELIRI) with or without bevacizumab or FOLFIRI with or without bevacizumab. Baseline characteristics, including KRAS mutation status and UGT1A1 gene polymorphism status, were similar between the 2 arms. Nearly all patients had received prior chemotherapy with oxaliplatin.

Seventy-three percent of patients with FOLFIRI arm and 53.2% of those in the XELIRI arm had grade 3 or 4 toxicities.

FOLFIRI was associated with a higher incidence of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia and leukopenia and all-grade anemia than XELIRI, while XELIRI was associated with a higher incidence of all-grade hand-foot syndrome and grade 3 to 4 diarrhea.

RELATED: HIPEC in Colorectal Cancer With Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

There was no significant difference in the rate of febrile neutropenia between the 2 treatment arms, though there was 1 treatment-related death in the FOLFIRI arm.

The addition of bevacizumab did not alter the safety profile of either regimen.

Reference

  1. Nakamura M, Kim TW, Xu R-h, et al. A multinational, randomized, phase III trial of XELIRI with or without bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI with or without bevacizumab as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: Safety analysis of Asian XELIRI project (AXEPT). J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(suppl):4S. Abstract 681.

Related Resources

You must be a registered member of Cancer Therapy Advisor to post a comment.

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters

Regimen and Drug Listings

GET FULL LISTINGS OF TREATMENT Regimens and Drug INFORMATION

Bone Cancer Regimens Drugs
Brain Cancer Regimens Drugs
Breast Cancer Regimens Drugs
Endocrine Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gastrointestinal Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gynecologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Head and Neck Cancer Regimens Drugs
Hematologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Lung Cancer Regimens Drugs
Other Cancers Regimens
Prostate Cancer Regimens Drugs
Rare Cancers Regimens
Renal Cell Carcinoma Regimens Drugs
Skin Cancer Regimens Drugs
Urologic Cancers Regimens Drugs