Novel Targeted Agents For First-line CLL Treatment

Research is needed to determine which targeted agents should be used in young, fit patients and elderly unfit patients, and which regimens should be used first.
Research is needed to determine which targeted agents should be used in young, fit patients and elderly unfit patients, and which regimens should be used first.

A new influx of targeted agents combined with data concerning the efficacy and tolerability of chemoimmunotherapy regimens call into question the current standards of care for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), according to a review published recently in Cancer Treatment Reviews.1

The disease primarily affects elderly patients with a median age of diagnosis of 71.2 A patient's age, comorbidities, and any possible chromosomal aberrations should influence treatment decisions, as these factors can affect the course of the disease and its treatment.

Current Standards

“The management of patients with CLL is undergoing improvements, particularly due to novel therapies,” review author Tadeusz Robak, MD, of the department of hematology at Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Poland, told Cancer Therapy Advisor.

“Purine analogs based immuno-chemotherapy, particularly fludarabine combined with cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR), is still the standard of care for first-line therapy of younger fit patients. But its use in older co-morbid patients is limited, particularly due to high toxicity,” Dr Robak said. “Recently, in this patient population, chlorambucil and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (rituximab, ofatumumab or obinutuzumab) are recommended as the first-line treatment.”

FCR is recommended for physically fit patients based on the results of the GCLLSG CLL8 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00281918) trial, which showed the first-line FCR significantly improved progression-free survival compared with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide alone (median 56.8 vs 32.9 months). But FCR was also associated with myelosuppression, hematologic toxicity, and infections, and patients older than 65 experienced these effects more frequently and with greater severity.3,4

A second study comparing first-line FCR to bendamustine and rituximab also showed an advantage for FCR, though no difference was observed among patients older than 65.5 Elderly patients who are physically fit are therefore recommended to undergo treatment with bendamustine and rituximab, a combination with fewer side effects but lower efficacy.

Among elderly patients with comorbidities, recent trials showed the efficacy of chlorambucil plus an anti-CD20 antibody such as obinutuzumab, ofatumumab, or rituximab. One trial showed that ofatumumab plus chlorambucil significantly improved progression-free survival, overall survival, and complete response compared with chlorambucil alone.6

RELATED: Venetoclax is Well Tolerated, Active in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Another study of chlorambucil plus an anti-CD20 antibody showed an increase in adverse events, suggesting a need for novel therapies to provide patients with improvements in efficacy and safety profiles.7

Page 1 of 2

Related Resources

Regimen and Drug Listings

GET FULL LISTINGS OF TREATMENT Regimens and Drug INFORMATION

Bone Cancer Regimens Drugs
Brain Cancer Regimens Drugs
Breast Cancer Regimens Drugs
Endocrine Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gastrointestinal Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gynecologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Head and Neck Cancer Regimens Drugs
Hematologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Lung Cancer Regimens Drugs
Other Cancers Regimens
Prostate Cancer Regimens Drugs
Rare Cancers Regimens
Renal Cell Carcinoma Regimens Drugs
Skin Cancer Regimens Drugs
Urologic Cancers Regimens Drugs

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters