ABVD, BEACOPP Demonstrate Similar Survival Advantage in Advanced-stage Hodgkin Lymphoma

Share this content:
ABVD and BEACOPP resulted in similar event-free survival and overall survival in patients with high-risk advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma.
ABVD and BEACOPP resulted in similar event-free survival and overall survival in patients with high-risk advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma.

Doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) and bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP) resulted in similar event-free survival and overall survival in patients with high-risk advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma, a study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology has shown.1

For the study, researchers enrolled 549 patients with clinical stage III or IV Hodgkin lymphoma between 2002 and 2010. All patients had an International Prognostic Score of 3 or higher and were aged 60 years or younger. Of those, 74% had stage IV disease, 81% were experiencing “B” symptoms, and 59% had an International Prognostic Score of 4 or higher.

Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive ABVD for 8 cycles or escalated-dose BEACOPP for 4 cycles followed by baseline BEACOPP for 4 cycles without radiotherapy.

Results showed that at a median follow-up of 3.6 years, 82.5% of patients in both arms achieved a complete response or an unconfirmed complete response.

Further, researchers found that at 4 years, event-free survival was 63.7% for ABVD compared with 69.3% for BEACOPP (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.64 - 1.15; P = .312). Disease-free survival was 85.8% and 91.0%, respectively (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.33 - 1.06; P = .076).

Overall survival was 86.7% with ABVD vs 90.3% with BEACOPP (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.42 - 1.21; P = .208).

RELATED: Adding Rituximab to Short Intensive Chemo Improves EFS in Burkitt Lymphoma

In regard to safety, 6 patients who received ABVD and 5 patients who were administered BEACOPP died as a result of toxicity. Early discontinuation occurred in 12 and 26 patients, respectively. Of note, 8 patients in the ABVD arm and 10 in the BEACOPP arm developed secondary malignancies.

“Because BEACOPP did not demonstrate a favorable effectiveness or toxicity ratio compared with ABVD, treatment burden, immediate and late toxicities, and associated costs must be considered before selecting one of these regimens on which to build future treatment strategies,” the authors concluded.

Reference

  1. Carde P, Karrasch M, Fortpied C, et al. Eight cycles of ABVD versus four cycles of BEACOPPescalated plus four cycles of BEACOPPbaseline in stage III to IV, International Prognostic Score ≥ 3, high-risk Hodgkin lymphoma: first results of the phase III EORTC 20012 Intergroup trial [published online ahead of print April 25, 2016]. J Clin Oncol. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.5648.

Related Resources

You must be a registered member of Cancer Therapy Advisor to post a comment.

Regimen and Drug Listings

GET FULL LISTINGS OF TREATMENT Regimens and Drug INFORMATION

Bone Cancer Regimens Drugs
Brain Cancer Regimens Drugs
Breast Cancer Regimens Drugs
Endocrine Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gastrointestinal Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gynecologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Head and Neck Cancer Regimens Drugs
Hematologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Lung Cancer Regimens Drugs
Other Cancers Regimens
Prostate Cancer Regimens Drugs
Rare Cancers Regimens
Renal Cell Carcinoma Regimens Drugs
Skin Cancer Regimens Drugs
Urologic Cancers Regimens Drugs

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters