Study Evaluates Cediranib Plus Saracatinib in Relapsed mRCC

Share this content:
Saracatinib, an Src inhibitor, did not improve the efficacy of cediranib in patients with relapsed metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Saracatinib, an Src inhibitor, did not improve the efficacy of cediranib in patients with relapsed metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Saracatinib, an Src inhibitor, did not improve the efficacy of cediranib, a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeted therapy, in patients with relapsed metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), a study published online ahead of print in the journal Annals of Oncology has shown.1

Because preclinical trials suggest that Src proteins play a role in the development of resistance to VEGF targeted therapy in clear cell RCC, researchers sought to evaluate this hypothesis by comparing cediranib plus saracatinib with cediranib plus placebo.

For the phase 2 study, researchers enrolled 138 patients with mRCC who experienced disease progression after 1 or more VEGF targeted therapies. Participants were randomly assigned to receive cediranib 30 mg once daily and saracatinib 175 mg once daily, or cediranib 45 mg once daily and placebo. Biomarker analyses were also conducted for SRC, FAK, VHL, PTB1b, and HIF2α levels.

Results showed that 13.0% of patients in the cediranib group and 14.5% of patients in the combination group achieved partial responses (P > .05). Researchers also observed no significant difference in progression-free survival (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.94 - 1.48) or overall survival (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.00 - 1.63) between the 2 arms.

There was no significant difference in the frequency of key adverse events, dose reductions, or treatment discontinuations.

RELATED: Time to Rethink Active Surveillance in African American Men With Prostate Cancer

Furthermore, the study demonstrated no prognostic association between the evaluated biomarkers and progression-free or overall survival; however, there was a correlation between FAK overexpression and overall survival benefit (HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.09 - 4.82; P > .05) for saracatinib plus cediranib.

Reference

  1. Powles T, Brown J, Larkin J, et al. A randomised, double-blind phase II study evaluating cediranib vs cediranib and saracatinib in patients with relapsed metastatic clear cell renal cancer (COSAK) [published online ahead of print January 22, 2016]. Ann Oncol. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw014.

Related Resources

You must be a registered member of Cancer Therapy Advisor to post a comment.

Regimen and Drug Listings

GET FULL LISTINGS OF TREATMENT Regimens and Drug INFORMATION

Bone Cancer Regimens Drugs
Brain Cancer Regimens Drugs
Breast Cancer Regimens Drugs
Endocrine Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gastrointestinal Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gynecologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Head and Neck Cancer Regimens Drugs
Hematologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Lung Cancer Regimens Drugs
Other Cancers Regimens
Prostate Cancer Regimens Drugs
Rare Cancers Regimens
Renal Cell Carcinoma Regimens Drugs
Skin Cancer Regimens Drugs
Urologic Cancers Regimens Drugs

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters