Melanoma: The State and Future of Treatment

Melanoma treatment has improved dramatically in the past decade, and new advancements are already on the horizon.
Melanoma treatment has improved dramatically in the past decade, and new advancements are already on the horizon.

In just the past few years, advances in the treatment of metastatic melanoma have drastically improved both overall and progression free survival for patients. But the sudden and increasing array of immunotherapy and targeted therapy possibilities, and their potential adverse effects, creates complicated questions and considerations for practitioners devising treatment strategies for individuals.

In 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved 2 classes of drugs that radically altered the treatment landscape, and outcomes, for patients with melanoma. The first type is checkpoint inhibitors, such as ipilimumab and nivolumab, which harness the immune system's natural ability to fight cancer by blocking either the CTLA-4 or PD-1 checkpoints. The other type is targeted therapy agents, beginning with vemurafenib, which inhibit the molecules driving tumor growth in patients with the BRAFV600E mutation.

The developments were, as a paper that same year called them, “spectacular.”1

“Never was there a more exciting period in the world of melanoma treatment,” the authors wrote.

Practitioners today say much the same.

“Immunotherapy really does hold great promise,” said Anthony Olszanski, MD, RPh, of the Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. “We are now finding out we can — with dual-inhibition immune therapy — we can actually benefit the majority of patients, with response rates in excess of 60%…And that's really remarkable given the fact that we had nothing like that before 2011.”

By 2014, the FDA had approved the targeted therapy drugs dabrafenib, which inhibits the B-Raf enzyme, and trametinib, which functions on the MEK protein, causing decreased cancer cell signaling and proliferation in BRAF-mutation positive patients.

“The BRAF and MEK inhibitors,” Dr Olszanski said, “were also revolutionary in the treatment of melanoma because we recognized that we had targets that we could go after with these small molecules.”

But only about half of patients harbor BRAF mutations. And, Dr Olszanski added, “we also recognized that the vast majority of patients would eventually relapse.”

RELATED: First-line Immune Checkpoint Inhibition Cost-effective in Melanoma

Both limitations may eventually be overcome, as Dr Olszanski noted in a 2015 article: “important research continues on the molecular basis of melanoma, and new targets are likely to emerge.”2

Page 1 of 2

Related Resources

You must be a registered member of Cancer Therapy Advisor to post a comment.

Regimen and Drug Listings

GET FULL LISTINGS OF TREATMENT Regimens and Drug INFORMATION

Bone Cancer Regimens Drugs
Brain Cancer Regimens Drugs
Breast Cancer Regimens Drugs
Endocrine Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gastrointestinal Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gynecologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Head and Neck Cancer Regimens Drugs
Hematologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Lung Cancer Regimens Drugs
Other Cancers Regimens
Prostate Cancer Regimens Drugs
Rare Cancers Regimens
Renal Cell Carcinoma Regimens Drugs
Skin Cancer Regimens Drugs
Urologic Cancers Regimens Drugs

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters