Vemurafenib Improves Overall Survival in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma

Share this content:

(CHICAGO, IL) – Vemurafenib improved overall survival (OS) in patients with BRAF600E-mutated metastatic melanoma, results of a Phase 3 study presented at the 2012 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting has found.

The presentation provided updated OS results for the randomized, open-label, multicenter BRIM-3 trial that compared the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib with dacarbazine in previously untreated patients. The study was headed by Paul B. Chapman, MD, a physician-scientist of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

The patient population (n=675) was randomized to 960mg twice-daily oral vemurafenib (n=337) or 1000mg/m2 intravenous dacarbazine every three weeks (n=338). They were then monitored to the co-primary endpoints of OS and progression-free survival (PFS).

At the February 1, 2012 data cut-off, median follow-up was 12.5 months for vemurafenib and 9.5 months for dacarbazine. In patients not censored at crossover, median OS was 13.6 months for vemurafenib vs. 10.3 months for dacarbazine (HR 0.76; P<0.01 post-hoc). In those censored at crossover, OS was 13.6 months for vemurafenib and 9.7 months for dacarbazine (HR 0.76; P<0.001 post-hoc).

A total of 44% of patients in the dacarbazine arm and 36% in the vemurafenib arm received any subsequent anticancer therapy; of these, 22% in the dacarbazine arm and 18% in the vemurafenib arm received ipilimumab and 83 patients (25%) in the dacarbazine arm crossed over to vemurafenib.

In the patients censored at crossover, vemurafenib also improved PFS (median 6.9 months vs. 1.6 months for dacarbazine; HR 0.38; P<0.001 log-rank post-hoc). OS and PFS by baseline characteristic — including age, sex, ECOG status, disease stage, and LDH—favored vemurafenib vs dacarbazine; for OS, the 95% confidence interval crossed for disease stage IIIc, M1a and M1b disease.

Objective response rate was 57% for the vemurafenib arm (5.6% complete responses and 51.3% partial responses) and 8.6% for dacarbazine (1.2% complete responses and 7.4% partial responses).

Selected adverse events that occurred more frequently in the vemurafenib group included cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, keratoacanthoma, and skin papilloma; 8 patients in the vemurafenib group reported new primary melanomas.

“Vemurafenib continues to be associated with improved efficacy compared with dacarbazine,” Dr. Chapman concluded.


Related Resources

You must be a registered member of Cancer Therapy Advisor to post a comment.

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters

Regimen and Drug Listings


Bone Cancer Regimens Drugs
Brain Cancer Regimens Drugs
Breast Cancer Regimens Drugs
Endocrine Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gastrointestinal Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gynecologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Head and Neck Cancer Regimens Drugs
Hematologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Lung Cancer Regimens Drugs
Other Cancers Regimens
Prostate Cancer Regimens Drugs
Rare Cancers Regimens
Renal Cell Carcinoma Regimens Drugs
Skin Cancer Regimens Drugs
Urologic Cancers Regimens Drugs