Second-Generation TKIs in Advanced CML: 7-Year Survival Rates

Share this content:
In patients who have been newly diagnosed with AP-CML, the initiation of TKI2 therapies in the frontline setting provided excellent responses and survival rates.
In patients who have been newly diagnosed with AP-CML, the initiation of TKI2 therapies in the frontline setting provided excellent responses and survival rates.
The following article features coverage from the American Society of Hematology (ASH) 2018 meeting. Click here to read more of Cancer Therapy Advisor's conference coverage.

SAN DIEGO — The administration of a frontline, second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI2) in advanced phase-chronic myeloid leukemia (AP-CML) was touted as a medication so beneficial for disease control and survival that it was “probably superior to that of imatinib first-line,” according to an abstract that preceded a presentation by Marie Basalt, MD, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France, at the 2018 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition in San Diego, California.1

The researchers retrospectively examined 66 patients who met the criteria for AP-CML at diagnosis and who had been treated with a TKI2 (nilotinib or dasatinib, 6 mg-800 mg twice daily or dasatinib 100 mg-140 mg once daily) in the first-line setting from 2008 to 2018.

Patients were stratified by type of advanced disease status to allow further analysis; there were 33 patients characterized as having hematological acceleration (HEM-AP) and 33 patients who were found to have additional cytogenetic abnormalities (ACA-AP). Nine patients had criteria for both, but were analyzed as HEM-AP.

Dasatinib was given to 19/33 patients (57.5%) in the HEM-AP group and to 8/33 pts (24%) in the ACA-AP group.

HEM-AP was characterized by any of the following features: blasts in peripheral blood (PB) or marrow (15%-29%), or blasts and promyelocytes in PB or marrow (> 30%) with blasts (< 30%), basophils in PB (≥ 20%), persistent thrombocytopenia (< 100 × 109/L) that was unrelated to therapy, and/or chromosomal abnormalities (ACA-AP) in addition to the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+) at diagnosis.

Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and failure-free survival (FFS) — the latter of which was defined as progression to blast crisis, death, loss of any previous response, or discontinuation of TKI2 as a result of toxicity — were analyzed at TKI2 initiation.

Treatment response did not appear to differ substantially between patients in the ACA-AP and HEM-AP groups: a complete hematological response was seen in 100% and 94% of patients, a major cytogenetic response (MCyR) was seen in 91% and 76% of patients, a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) was seen in 91% and 73% of patients, and a major molecular response was seen in 85% and 70% of patients, respectively.

There were also no significant differences between groups in the 7-year FFS, PFS, or OS rates, and the type of TKI2 used did not influence outcomes between groups, either. Overall, 7-year OS was 87.14% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.5-100), 7-year PFS was 83.42% (95% CI, 69.6-100), and 7-year FFS was 56.92% (95% CI, 40-81).

However, in contrast, twice as many patients with an ACA-AP status achieved a deep molecular response compared with HEM-AP patients (66% vs 33%, P = .013, Fisher test).

In conclusion, Dr Basalt stressed that allo-SCT should not be considered as first-line treatment in AP-CML, and that TKI2s as primary therapies “counterbalance the negative impact of this advanced disease.”

Disclosure: The presenters received financial support from various pharmaceutical companies related to this research. For a full list of disclosures, please review the original abstract.

Read more of Cancer Therapy Advisor's coverage of the ASH 2018 meeting by visiting the conference page.

Reference

  1. Balsat M, Alcazer V, Etienne G, et al. First-line second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in newly diagnosed accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Oral presentation at: American Society of Hematology 60th Annual Meeting & Exposition; December 1-4, 2018; San Diego, CA. Abstract 48.

Related Resources

You must be a registered member of Cancer Therapy Advisor to post a comment.

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters



Regimen and Drug Listings

GET FULL LISTINGS OF TREATMENT Regimens and Drug INFORMATION

Bone Cancer Regimens Drugs
Brain Cancer Regimens Drugs
Breast Cancer Regimens Drugs
Endocrine Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gastrointestinal Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gynecologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Head and Neck Cancer Regimens Drugs
Hematologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Lung Cancer Regimens Drugs
Other Cancers Regimens
Prostate Cancer Regimens Drugs
Rare Cancers Regimens
Renal Cell Carcinoma Regimens Drugs
Skin Cancer Regimens Drugs
Urologic Cancers Regimens Drugs