Computed Radiography 21% Less Effective Than Screen-Film Mammography

This article originally appeared here.
Share this content:
Screen-Film Mammography Bests Computed Radiography
Screen-Film Mammography Bests Computed Radiography

(HealthDay News) -- Computed radiography (CR) systems are 21% less effective at detecting breast cancers than screen-film mammography (SFM), according to a study published in the September issue of Radiology.

Anna M. Chiarelli, Ph.D., from Cancer Care Ontario in Toronto, and colleagues followed concurrent cohorts of women (aged 50 to 74 years) screened with digital direct radiography (DR) (220,520 women), CR (64,210), or SFM (403,688; the reference cohort) between 2008 and 2009.

The researchers found that the cancer detection rate was similar for DR (4.9 per 1,000) and SFM (4.8 per 1,000); however, the rate was significantly lower for CR (3.4 per 1,000; odds ratio, 0.79). Compared to recall rates for SFM (7.4%), recall rates for DR were higher (7.7%) and recall rates for CR were lower (6.6%). For CR, the positive predictive value was non-significantly lower (5.2%) than for SFM (6.6%).

"Screening programs should monitor the performance of CR separately and may consider informing women of the potentially lower cancer detection rates," the authors write.

Related: Breast Cancer Resource Center

Related Resources

You must be a registered member of Cancer Therapy Advisor to post a comment.

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters

Regimen and Drug Listings


Bone Cancer Regimens Drugs
Brain Cancer Regimens Drugs
Breast Cancer Regimens Drugs
Endocrine Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gastrointestinal Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gynecologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Head and Neck Cancer Regimens Drugs
Hematologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Lung Cancer Regimens Drugs
Other Cancers Regimens
Prostate Cancer Regimens Drugs
Rare Cancers Regimens
Renal Cell Carcinoma Regimens Drugs
Skin Cancer Regimens Drugs
Urologic Cancers Regimens Drugs