A Review of New Microhematuria Guidelines from the American Urological Association

Share this content:
A Review of New Microhematuria Guidelines from the American Urological Association
A Review of New Microhematuria Guidelines from the American Urological Association
Asymptomatic microhematuria, one of the most common urological findings, presents an important diagnostic challenge. Because it is so prevalent with rates ranging from 2% and more than 30%, depending on the population, health care providers must balance the need for a thorough and complete workup with the potential risks and costs associated with diagnostic studies.1-4 While asymptomatic microhematuria is most often benign in origin—from infection, urinary stones, or benign prostatic hyperplasia—microhematuria is frequently the earliest sign of a number of urologic malignancies, most prominently bladder cancer, upper tract urothelial carcinoma, and renal cell carcinoma.

Despite this fact, data regarding the necessary components of a microhematuria workup are limited. And, until recently, broad recommendations for the appropriate evaluation of microhematuria were limited to the 2001 Best Practice Statement from the American Urological Association (AUA).5,6 However, these guidelines are more clear with the recent release of the AUA Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Follow-up of Asymptomatic Microhematuria in Adults.7 This article reviews the key components of the new recommendations for the workup of asymptomatic microhematuria.


The new AUA guidelines provide a definition of microhematuria that is a departure from the prior Best Practice definition requiring red blood cells (RBCs) to be present on two of three specimens. Now, a single properly collected urine specimen with three or more RBCs present per high-powered field (and with no evidence of infection) is sufficient to warrant evaluation unless a clear benign cause of origin such as trauma is present. While this change may seem minor, it has practical implications, simplifying when patients should be referred from their primary care doctors and expediting the urologic workup. Importantly, a positive dipstick is still not sufficient to diagnose microhematuria, and microanalysis is necessary to confirm the presence of RBCs.


The workup of microhematuria involves several steps. Initially, the microscopic urine evaluation should determine whether urinary casts or dysmorphic RBCs are present, suggesting medical renal disease. Serum creatinine/BUN should be obtained to evaluate for the same. Even if medical renal disease is suspected, there is still a risk of urologic malignancy, and the AUA guideline recommends that a full urological evaluation be performed nonetheless. Additionally, while microhematuria occurs more frequently in patients who are anticoagulated, urological evaluation is still warranted in these individuals in the setting of asymptomatic microhematuria.

Page 1 of 2

Related Resources

You must be a registered member of Cancer Therapy Advisor to post a comment.

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters

Regimen and Drug Listings


Bone Cancer Regimens Drugs
Brain Cancer Regimens Drugs
Breast Cancer Regimens Drugs
Endocrine Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gastrointestinal Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gynecologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Head and Neck Cancer Regimens Drugs
Hematologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Lung Cancer Regimens Drugs
Other Cancers Regimens
Prostate Cancer Regimens Drugs
Rare Cancers Regimens
Renal Cell Carcinoma Regimens Drugs
Skin Cancer Regimens Drugs
Urologic Cancers Regimens Drugs