Wait and Watch After CRT May Be Safe for Patients With Rectal Cancer

Share this content:
A substantial proportion of patients with rectal cancer managed by the watch-and-wait approach avoided a major operation.
A substantial proportion of patients with rectal cancer managed by the watch-and-wait approach avoided a major operation.

A substantial proportion of patients with rectal cancer managed by the watch-and-wait approach avoided a major operation and averted permanent colostomy without differences in 3-year non-regrowth disease-free survival compared with patients who underwent surgical resection, a new study published online ahead of print in the journal The Lancet Oncology has shown.1

Although a watch-and-wait approach has emerged as a management strategy for patients with rectal cancer after they have achieved a clinical complete response with chemoradiotherapy, there is limited evidence evaluating the safety of this approach.

Therefore, researchers sought to compare oncological outcomes between patients managed by watch and wait who achieved a clinical complete response and those who underwent surgical resection.

For the ONCORE cohort analysis study, researchers included 259 patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma without distant metastases who had received preoperative chemoradiotherapy consisting of fluoropyrmidine-based chemotherapy.

Patients who achieved a complete clinical response were offered watch-and-wait management and patients who did not have a clinical complete response were offered surgical resection.

A total of 129 patients were managed by watch and wait. Of those, 34% had local regrowths and 88% of 41 patients with non-metastatic local regrowths were salvaged.

Researchers found no differences in 3-year non-regrowth disease-free survival between the watch-and-wait group and the surgical resection group (P = .043). There was also no difference in the 3-year overall survival rate between the 2 groups (P = .024).

RELATED: Durable response using regorafenib in an elderly patient with metastatic colorectal cancer: case report

The study demonstrated that patients managed by watch and wait had significantly better 3-year colostomy-free survival compared with those who had undergone surgical resection (HR, 0.445; 95% CI, 0.31 - 0.64; P < .0001).

“These findings should inform decision making at the outset of chemotherapy,” the investigators concluded.

Reference

  1. Renehan AG, Malcomson L, Emsley R, et al. Watch-and-wait approach versus surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer (the OnCoRe project): a propensity-score matched cohort analysis [published online ahead of print December 16, 2015]. Lancet Oncol. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00467-2.

Related Resources

You must be a registered member of Cancer Therapy Advisor to post a comment.

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters



Regimen and Drug Listings

GET FULL LISTINGS OF TREATMENT Regimens and Drug INFORMATION

Bone Cancer Regimens Drugs
Brain Cancer Regimens Drugs
Breast Cancer Regimens Drugs
Endocrine Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gastrointestinal Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gynecologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Head and Neck Cancer Regimens Drugs
Hematologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Lung Cancer Regimens Drugs
Other Cancers Regimens
Prostate Cancer Regimens Drugs
Rare Cancers Regimens
Renal Cell Carcinoma Regimens Drugs
Skin Cancer Regimens Drugs
Urologic Cancers Regimens Drugs