ATRA Plus Arsenic Trioxide Feasible for Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

Share this content:
Patients with APL showed no difference in quality of life when treated with ATRA compared with ATRA plus arsenic trioxide.
Patients with APL showed no difference in quality of life when treated with ATRA compared with ATRA plus arsenic trioxide.

All-trans­ retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide is a feasible treatment option for low-risk and high-risk patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), a recent study published online ahead of print in the journal The Lancet Oncology has shown.1

APL is a chemotherapy-sensitive subgroup of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). It is characterized by the presence of the PML-RARA fusion transcript.1 Patients with APL constitute only 10% to 12% of those with AML.2

For the controlled, multicenter, AML17 trial, researchers enrolled 235 patients with APL receiving treatment from 81 hospitals in the United Kingdom.

Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive treatment with ATRA and arsenic trioxide or ATRA and idarubicin. ATRA was administered to both groups in a daily divided oral dose of 45 mg/m2 until remission, or until day 60, and then in 4-week cycles consisting of 2 weeks on and 2 weeks off therapy.1

Arsenic trioxide was given intravenously at 0.3 mg/kg on days 1 to 5 of each course, and at 0.25 mg/kg twice weekly in weeks 2 to 8 of course 1 and weeks 2 to 4 of courses 2 to 5.

In the idarubicin group, idarubicin was administered intravenously at 12 mg/m2 on days 2, 4, 6, and 8 of course 1, and then at 5 mg/m2 on days 1 to 4 of course 2; mitoxantrone at 10 mg/m2 on days 1 to 4 of course 3, and idarubicin at 12 mg/m2 on day 1 of the fourth course.

RELATED: Allogeneic HSCT May Be Preferred in Certain Older Patients with Acute Leukemia

High-risk patients could receive an initial dose of the immunoconjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin at a dose of 6 mg/m2 administered intravenously. Neither group received maintenance treatment or central nervous system prophylaxis.1

Results showed quality of life did not significantly differ between the two treatment arms. In regard to safety, about 34% of patients in the ATRA plus arsenic trioxide group reported grade 3 to 4 toxicities compared with nearly 48% in the ATRA plus idarubicin group.

Page 1 of 2

Related Resources

You must be a registered member of Cancer Therapy Advisor to post a comment.

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters

Regimen and Drug Listings


Bone Cancer Regimens Drugs
Brain Cancer Regimens Drugs
Breast Cancer Regimens Drugs
Endocrine Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gastrointestinal Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gynecologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Head and Neck Cancer Regimens Drugs
Hematologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Lung Cancer Regimens Drugs
Other Cancers Regimens
Prostate Cancer Regimens Drugs
Rare Cancers Regimens
Renal Cell Carcinoma Regimens Drugs
Skin Cancer Regimens Drugs
Urologic Cancers Regimens Drugs