Adding pertuzumab to treatment with trastuzumab and chemotherapy can prolong survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer but is not cost effective, according to research published in JAMA Oncology.

In fact, pertuzumab would not be considered cost effective even after a 100% price reduction, according to researchers.

The researchers conducted a population-based, retrospective study of patients in Canada. The team compared treatment with pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy after pertuzumab became publicly funded on November 25, 2013, to treatment with trastuzumab and chemotherapy before that time.


Continue Reading

The study included matched patients who had metastatic breast cancer and received trastuzumab plus chemotherapy with pertuzumab (n=579) or without pertuzumab (n=579).

Use of pertuzumab resulted in 3.08 mean life-years (LYs) gained and 2.11 mean quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. In the control group, treatment resulted in a mean 2.48 LYs gained and 1.67 mean QALYs gained.

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for the pertuzumab group compared with the control group was $316,203 CAD per LY gained and $436,679 CAD per QALY gained. 

The main contributors to the cost differences were the cost of pertuzumab itself (60%), outpatient cancer treatment delivery (24%), and trastuzumab (15%).

The researchers noted that, even when the price of pertuzumab was reduced 100%, the ICER was $174,027 CAD per QALY, and this exceeds the conventional willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY.

“Results of this study suggest that, based on the conventional willingness-to-pay threshold, pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy would not be considered cost effective, even if pertuzumab was free,” the researchers concluded.

Reference

Dai WF, Beca JM, Nagamuthu C, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pertuzumab with trastuzumab in patients with metastatic breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. Published online February 24, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.8049