Emerging Strategies for Treating Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases

Share this content:
The role of WBRT for brain metastases is unclear with the advent of new and emerging treatments.
The role of WBRT for brain metastases is unclear with the advent of new and emerging treatments.

Advances in treatment therapies for non-small cell lung cancer —including chemotherapy options capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier and widespread availability of precision radiotherapy devices — offer new strategies for the management of brain metastases, dramatically improving overall survival (OS).

“There has been quite a shift in the use of whole-brain irradiation versus stereotactic radiosurgery,” said Nagy Elsayyad, MD, a radiation oncologist and associate professor at the University of Miami's Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center in Florida. “The whole idea of using irradiation or surgery has been that there are very few chemotherapeutic agents, until recently, that cross the blood-brain barrier.”

The growing list of options and the expanding body of research, said Dr Elsayyad, is leading to increasingly individualized therapeutic strategies “aiming more and more toward sparing the brain.”

But the rapidly changing treatment landscape is causing debate over the efficacy and adverse effects of the various therapeutic strategies along with calls for more studies to determine the most effective management strategies.

One of the most recent additions to the discussion, a multi-institutional analysis published in January, compared outcomes for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation who developed brain metastases.1 Of the 351 patients included in the study, 131 (37%) received a EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) at intracranial progression. Another 120 (34%) received WBRT followed by an EGFR-TKI. A third group of 100 patients (29%) were treated with SRS followed by an EGFR-TKI.

The findings showed vivid differences in OS among the 3 groups, with initial SRS treatment yielding distinctly better results.

The study fueled the controversy over the use of WBRT. The authors noted that WBRT is associated with declines in cognitive functioning and quality of life scores, while “numerous studies have demonstrated that SRS has less acute and late toxicity.”

RELATED: Efficacy of Osimertinib in Advanced T790M-positive NSCLC

An editorial accompanying the study noted that “it seems time to weigh the benefits of deferring or withholding WBRT in the era of targeted therapies.”2

Page 1 of 2

Related Resources

You must be a registered member of Cancer Therapy Advisor to post a comment.

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters

Regimen and Drug Listings


Bone Cancer Regimens Drugs
Brain Cancer Regimens Drugs
Breast Cancer Regimens Drugs
Endocrine Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gastrointestinal Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gynecologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Head and Neck Cancer Regimens Drugs
Hematologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Lung Cancer Regimens Drugs
Other Cancers Regimens
Prostate Cancer Regimens Drugs
Rare Cancers Regimens
Renal Cell Carcinoma Regimens Drugs
Skin Cancer Regimens Drugs
Urologic Cancers Regimens Drugs