Enzalutamide May Be Better Than Bicalutamide for Asymptomatic, Mildly Symptomatic mCRPC

Share this content:
Data from the TERRAIN trial support the use of enzalutamide rather than bicalutamide in prostate cancer.
Data from the TERRAIN trial support the use of enzalutamide rather than bicalutamide in prostate cancer.

Data from the TERRAIN trial support the use of enzalutamide rather than bicalutamide in patients with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), a study published the journal The Lancet Oncology has shown.1

Because enzalutamide, an oral androgen-receptor inhibitor has been shown to improve survival in two phase 3 trials and is approved for patients with mCRPC, researchers sought to compare the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide with bicalutamide in this patient population.

For the double-blind, phase 2 trial, researchers enrolled 375 patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic men with prostate cancer who progressed on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive enzalutamide 160 mg orally daily or bicalutamide 50 mg orally daily, in addition to ADT, until disease progression.

Results showed that median progression-free survival was 15.7 (95% CI, 11.5 - 19.4) with enzalutamide compared with 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.8 - 8.1) with bicalutamide (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.34 - 0.57; P < .0001) after a median follow-up of 20.0 months and 16.7 months, respectively.

In regard to safety, the most common adverse events in the enzalutamide or bicalutamide groups were fatigue, back pain, hot flush, nausea, constipation and arthralgia. Grade 3 or higher adverse events included hypertension hydronephrosis, back pain, pathological fracture, dyspnea, bone pain, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and anemia.

RELATED: DNA Damage, Repair Profiling May Help Manage High-Risk Prostate Cancer

Serious adverse events occurred in 31% and 23% of patients in the enzalutamide and bicalutamide groups, respectively. Of note, 1 death in the enzalutamide group may be associated with treatment-related systemic inflammatory response syndrome.


  1. Shore ND, Chowdhury S, Villers A, et al. Efficacy and safety of enzalutamide versus bicalutamide for patients with metastatic prostate cancer (TERRAIN): a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 study [published online ahead of print January 13, 2016]. Lancet Oncology. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00518-5.

Related Resources

You must be a registered member of Cancer Therapy Advisor to post a comment.

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters

Regimen and Drug Listings


Bone Cancer Regimens Drugs
Brain Cancer Regimens Drugs
Breast Cancer Regimens Drugs
Endocrine Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gastrointestinal Cancer Regimens Drugs
Gynecologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Head and Neck Cancer Regimens Drugs
Hematologic Cancer Regimens Drugs
Lung Cancer Regimens Drugs
Other Cancers Regimens
Prostate Cancer Regimens Drugs
Rare Cancers Regimens
Renal Cell Carcinoma Regimens Drugs
Skin Cancer Regimens Drugs
Urologic Cancers Regimens Drugs